Business News Flash: Jeff Bezos


Jeff_bezosYesterday, the Washington Post (the oldest periodic publication in D.C.) reported that Amazon's founder and CEO Jeff Bezos was buying the flagship newspaper and other properties for $250 million. 

Oh, boy, this makes me laugh so hard!

  Not because the newspaper famous for its almost exclusive focus on the national politics is now owned by a person, whose political stance is not very clear: all we know for a fact is that he is a strong supporter of gay marriage (who in the entertainment distribution isn't, especially in Seattle?) and the Internet sales tax (because it will wipe out his small-size competition in the online consumer-goods marketplace).  After all, his first priority has always been the expansion of his business, and this might be a good complement to his empire.

These news make me laugh, because I still remember how I was one of the first people I knew to set up an account with young Amazon in 1995.  I can recall everyone telling me that I shouldn't rely too much on them, because "the logistics" will never work.  And I will never forget how the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times both predicted Amazon's doom in the late 90s (it already went public by then), because the company was in red year after year.

Guess what, it still posts losses ($39 million in 2012), but nobody seems to be concerned anymore.  It's a conglomerate that owns 17 brands, including Amazon itself, which  became a global source of… pretty much everything.  Most importantly it made Jeff Bezos a billionaire ($25 billion evaluation as of this year), who doesn't mind dropping a mere 1% of his wealth to buy himself a "little rag" like Washington Post.  It's like if you decided to take $5K out of your $500K (if you are lucky) savings and treat yourself to a nice weekend in Paris.  Not a big deal!       

Quote of the Week: “Sharknado”? Is It a Real Movie? It Must Be a Joke, Right?


From New York magazine’s mini-interview with Sigourney Weaver at the 15th Annual Broadway Barks animal adoption event:

“NYM: Did you watch Sharknado?

SW: What? Was there a shark attack?

NYM: So you have not heard of Sharknado?

SW: Are they giving away sharks? Do I have to hold one?

NYM: Any ideas what it could possibly be?

SW: N-a-t-o?

NYM: N-a-d-o.

SW: Is it a convention for sharks?

NYM: It’s a made-for-TV movie about shark tornadoes.

SW: Wow.  Thousands of sharks swirling?  Does it happen way out at sea?

NYM: It’s happening on land.

SW: It’s like The Wizard of Oz gone mad?

NYM: Essentially.

SW: People are out of their minds.”

P.S. from The Frustrated CFO:

1. It was me who thought it was a joke.

2. 100% agree with Ms. Weaver’s sentiment.

3.  Yet, according to the social media, Sharknado has become a social-media phenomenon, generating over 5,000 tweets (almost beating Game of Thrones‘ the Red Wedding episode).  And, since the substance of social-media exchanges (as well as of the entertainment itself) doesn’t matter anymore, but only numbers count, Hollywood studios are very jealous of the unprecedented “success,” while Syfy definitely considers a sequel.  Hallelujah!

CFO Folklore: Watch Out for Sudden Meetings Behind Closed Doors


Proximity%20hotel%20-%20acoustical%20harmony%20wallcoveringIf you are an executive employee (i.e. hired help, not an owner) in a small business,  you know what I'm talking about. 

Everything used to be pretty transparent: The owner(s) dropped by your office and discussed strategic issues sitting in front of your desk.  They ran their ideas by you, stealing yours in the process, which you didn't mind, because you've learned to think of it as a sign of their appreciation.  You were a mandatory participant in tactical meetings with various third-parties and considered a welcomed member of the Board of Directors.  You were copied on all email exchanges, etc.

Then, BLAM! All of a sudden everything is hush-hush.  And it's not like you did anything wrong or have been slacking.  No, you are still your highly professional and ingenious self.  Yet, when the owners meet (without you now), they close the doors.  You know that there are meetings going on without you.  You know that there are important matters that your general business acumen could've helped to resolve, but the owners don't seek your opinion anymore.  From what you can see (and if you are a CFO, you see more than anyone else)  they need your help, but they don't want it.  You are excluded from anything outside of your direct professional responsibilities. 

And this is unpleasant, to say the least, because, let's face it:

(a) It's a negative change – it would be better not to be included in the first place, then experience rejection for some unknown reason; one minute you were special, an equal, and another (this is how you feel) you are not different from the receptionist, and

(b) The whole damn thing forces you into a guessing mode, which is a direct way to anxiety and depression.

While this situation is definitely common, I will allow that reasons behind it could vary from business to business, and from one owner's personality to another.  Yet, I bet that the following four scenarios, crystallized from years of close observation of various business owners, are applicable to the majority of cases:

1.  The owner(s) feel intimidated by you. This happens very frequently.  Many businessmen have superiority complex and think that they are the smartest people in any room.  And then you enter the picture.  At some point the owner realizes that you know more, catch faster, and handle things better than him. 

Most hired execs (including yours truly) think it's unfair that We, the brilliant and the laudable, are forced to work for "some schmucks," but the person on the other side is hurting too.  No, no, no, I'm not going to feel sorry for the poor millionaire boss, but just think for a second – he is caught between the understanding how important you are for the company and his desire to stop feeling like an idiot in your presence. 

This sounds like a difficult situation, but rationally speaking this is the best case scenario.  IF the boss is a logical person, who cares for his company's (and his own) well being - he will come around; the doors will be opened again.  Of course, if he is a self-centered asshole on an ego trip and nothing else matters… see Scenario 4b. 

2.  The owners fucked something they are responsible for and the business is not doing well (you, the CFO, may not even know it, because the commercial errors didn't translate themselves into fiscal events  yet, but it's coming).  The last thing they need at this point is you judging them with your I-told-you-so eyes.  They feel so awkward that they'd rather hide away than use your help.

3.  The troubles are even worth – to the degree that makes them loose sleep and keeps them in a state of perpetual panic.  The problem may not even be caused by the business that employs you.  For example, one of the owners just got an audit notice from IRS; he knows that some shit could be found in his other businesses that will destroy everything.  Or an owner got busted with large quantities of cocaine on him.  Stuff like that.  Well, you should consider yourself lucky that you are not invited inside those conference rooms with closed doors - you are better off not knowing anything about it for the sake of plausible deniability.

4.  The worst case scenario - the meetings are specifically about getting rid of you, while minimizing the impact on the company. We can further subdivide this one according to the underlying causes:

(a)  You are too expensive and the owners, while knowing very well that you worth every penny they pay you, don't think the business can afford you anymore, not even with a 30% base reduction.

(b)  That owner in the first scenario simply cannot deal with your superiority any longer.  He doesn't care how good you are, you've got to go, so that he can forget about you (and he will) and start feeling good about himself again.  I have to say, this one is your own fault – if you needed that job, you should've curbed your attitude.  (Oh boy, don't I know how incredibly difficult that is!)       

Oh yeah, I almost forgot!  There is a possibility of a fifth scenario (also straight from my experience with rampant business owners): If the boss starts having frequent (and kind of longish) meetings behind closed doors not with other execs or third-party relations, but with his secretary, you probably need to read my post When Your Boss's Secretary Becomes His Girlfriend, written 2.5 years ago.  It is, by the way, one of The Frustrated CFO's Top 5 most popular posts to date.  So, I know that this particular scenario is very common. 

While the reasons for the closed doors vary, your course of action is limited two just two options: (a) suck it up and continue doing your job for the sake of your paycheck, or (b) look for another job and, if you get lucky (real tough for CFOs nowadays),  get out.  Take my advice: don't lower yourself to passive-aggressive stance, or seek an open confrontation with the owners, or attempt to "ask around."  You will not achieve anything this away and it will only make you feel worse.  

Reading China Daily USA: Finally Some Good News!


6a00d8351a101753ef0167648cba83970b-800wiThrough the years of traveling on business overseas, I've developed a taste for European editions of CNN – I am always curious to see what Brits, Germans, and French consider important to talk about.  The outsiders' perspective on the news is very illuminating.  They spin everything in a different (frequently unflattering to the US) light.  Plus, most of the time you hear things you would never learn reading the New York Times or watching NBC.

Presently, I have a client with a majority ownership held by Chinese Americans.  And it was in their offices that I first saw China Daily - the largest Chinese English-language newspaper.  Aha, a chance to be exposed to yet another point of view and some possibly exotic news!  How could I resist?  I skimmed through one issue.  And guess what?  Right away it offered a fascinating article full of very refreshing news.  

It turns out that European investors and businesses are quickly adapting themselves to the reality of new China.  The times of outsourcing manufacturing to Chinese factories in order to benefit from cheap labor and maximize profits are over.  First of all, the labor is not that cheap anymore – both the cost of living and the wages have been rising steadily.  More importantly, China has been experiencing a rapid growth of the middle-class.  This turned the country into a huge market with high demands for various products.  

The first ones to recognize this shift were the Chinese manufacturers themselves, who started applying their experience (the decades of producing for Europe and the US didn't go to waste) to making the products needed in their domestic markets. Thus, the labor has become not only more expensive, but also scarce.  Yet, according to the quotes provided by German and French bankers, these local producers can only cover a relatively moderate portion of the demand – there is still plenty of room for foreign companies to move in.

The article also highlights another opportunity, which comes from a change in China's collective mentality with respect to the environmental issues.  Of course, they have no chance to reverse the terrible damage they've already done to the entire world, but there is definitely a possibility for some people to make a quick buck.  Apparently, China is desperately trying to bring in green technologies.  European companies have already entered the growing sectors of environmentally friendly insulation, heating solutions, and solar energy. 

Moreover, the Chinese government started enforcing pollution standards in various industries.  They go as far as closing plants that do not comply.  This definitely opens manufacturing gaps, which competitive foreign companies will do their best to close.

The article points out that one of the biggest obstacles of the successful integration with local partners is the absence of the well-developed telecommunications, which makes the establishing of the necessary digital networks quite difficult.  The international banks, eager to provide their clients ("CFOs in Hamburg," the article calls them) with online banking capabilities, suffer from this drawback the most. 

Funny: the Chinese can knock off a Mercedes that will pass a German inspection with flying colors, but the Internet connectivity (which, let's face it, has become a basic necessity for us – like water, food, and air) is a hurdle.  It's all by design, of course.  Keeping people from being connected to the world is important for the communist government: politics will always take the precedence over the national wealth.  But I'm guessing, as Germans and French move in with their technologies, services, standards, and products, the exposure to the World at large will be inevitable.

Paul Allen, senior vice-president and head of the European corporate banking at HSBC China, noted, "There is no doubt that international brands have an increasing appeal in China."  How fascinating: the wealthier members of the middle-class don't want to buy products labeled "Made in China!"  They want Italian, German, French, Dutch goods in their households and on themselves.  I'm with them on that one.                     

So, Europeans are getting on this making-money-on-China wagon faster than we can say, "Trade deficit reduction."  What about us?  There were no American quotes in the article – not from bankers, or businessmen, or private equity investors.  Is it going to be the same trend we experience in fashion – with us always two seasons behind?  

Of course, it's not like we can compete with Italians and French in consumer brands (ours are all made in China, remember?).  But what about technologies, energy solutions, industrial goods?  Are we going to seat this one out as well?  Is Hollywood will be the only sector viciously going after the Chinese market (see my distressed quote from a month ago enclosed)? 

I fucking hope not.   This client of mine, whose core business has always been importing chemicals from Taiwan and Korea for domestic distribution, is currently working very hard on developing a program for exporting US prime-grade environmentally-friendly PVC for Chinese market.   It's possible that other companies with Chinese connections are doing the same.

The question is why our business publications are not screaming about these opportunities?  Even more to the point: Why the hell our government is not working on some major incentive programs for small businesses to enter this market and grow stronger, while benefiting the national economy in the process?  What?  Too busy bailing out the banks and supporting the stock market?  

Related articles

Quote of the Week: "Man of Steel" and New Hollywood Economics

Quote of the Week: What Progress? Nothing Has Changed since Ancient Rome


Fighter at Rest"The art of living is more like wrestling than dancing."

                Marcus Aurelius

                (121 – 180 A.D.)