Tag: Business

Job Search: Ageism


Age discrimination is an undeniable fact of our lives.  Young people are never taken seriously as customers, clients, health patients, philosophers, business developers, etc.  On the other hand, media, entertainment, advertising and marketing adore youth.  And one thing is sure: their "young" status is going to change.   Discrimination of older people even more pervasive and they don't even have a benefit of hoping for improvements. 

The problem is particularly acute in human resources.  The age discrimination is at its worst when you are searching for a job, or expecting layoffs, or know you may be deemed too expensive.  

 According to a research quoted in The Gale Group's  Small Business Encyclopedia, over 52% of surveyed executives admitted that age is one of the key factors in job searches for people 47 years old and up.  What do I think about that number?  The other 48% lied.  Age is ALWAYS a factor. For one or another reason, when we hire people we take their age into consideration.  So, we should accept that, when the tables are turned, we will be treated the same way.

I have to own up to the fact that while wearing the CFO's hiring hat, I automatically estimate the age of applicants.   I don't care about their age per se.  I do it to quantify their accomplishments against the length of their careers.  It helps with assessing their work ethics and personal ambitions.  

Other hiring managers and recruiters don't even have a justification like that.  They just go, "Too old," and send the resume into Trash.  With the job security becoming a myth of long-forgotten times, more and more middle aged people will be forced to enter the circles of job search hell.  This possibility practically hangs over everyone's head in the world of vulnerable small-size businesses.

Having that in mind, I would like to share with you an extremely useful The Ladders' article on adapting your job search, your professional "brand" and your resume to your age: Job Search in Your 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s and 60s.

By the way, is it just me, or have you also noticed the funniest thing (I am not laughing) that's happening in our media?  The "official"economists, major newspaper analysts and politicians are trying to convince us that the recession has ended months ago and we are "recovering".  Yet, every article or post related to job search and HR issues contains a phrase "especially in this economy" and you can almost hear the author's sad sigh.  

I think the old terminology of recession, recovery, economic conditions have lost their meaning.  People just don't want to admit it to themselves, because, as I frequently say, they are afraid of changes, especially changes for the worse.    The phrase "this economy" gives a false hope of a better future.  The truth is – we live in a NEW REALITY.  This is the "recovered" state.  Things are only going to get more difficult.  Everyone should be prepared to face job search ordeals in their 50s, 60s, and beyond.

Female CFOs and Controllers: Are We Equal?


March 8th, 2011 marked the 100th Anniversary of International Women's Day.  

I have to confess my aversion to such holidays.  Why do we need designated days to appreciate mothers, fathers, love, Earth, women?  It's like we treat them badly all year long and then try to make up for it in a single day. 

The Women's Day also troubles me because of its Socialist origins.  However, it provides an opportunity to raise issues of social and professional inequality.  If we have to choose between one day of awareness vs. none, of course, one is a better choice. 

Especially, if A-list stars like Daniel Craig and Judi Dench commemorate it with a video for Equals? partnership.  Watch it: Dame Judi spends two minutes reciting statistics of global-scale injustice.  It's important, but may create an illusion of remoteness.  When she says that women perform 2/3 of work, but earn only 10% of income and own 1% of property, surely, it accounts for all those "other" countries. 

Well, are we equal to our male counterparts here, in corporate America? 

Let's see.  The pay gap is still 19%.  Let me spell it out: a female CFO or Controller will make 81 cents against a dollar earned by a man in the same position.  Among the Fortune 500 companies,  only 9% of CFOs are female.  The same goes for Midcap 1500…  Enough of this lifeless statistical data.  Let me pull few examples out of my personal experience folder.

The brightest auditor I've known was assigned to my books by the CPA firm I've engaged about eight years ago.  Every time I praise her to the senior partner, he tells me that she knows ten times more than he does.  At one point I asked, when she was going to make a partner?  The answer was, "Well, the company never had a female partner before…"    

For many years I've been invited to participate in executive focus groups.  Banks are particularly interested in researching opinions of CFOs, Controllers and Treasurers.  There is never more than 25% of women in a group.  Once, when the subject was Board of Directors' accounting awareness, I was the only female participant.

Speaking of BODs, during internet bubble I worked for a high-tech start-up backed by venture capital.  The investors had their hands in a lot of businesses, which forced them onto a merry-go-round of board meetings.  They were freshly surprised every time I presented monthly results.  All other investees had male CFOs.

Five years ago I was asked by my boss to give up my CFO office for a newly hired COO.  What made this person more important than me?  Nothing at all, except for his gender.  The boss said, "I just cannot put him into a smaller office."  Really?  This big shot spent most of his time just staring out of the window.

Notice how cleverly the Equals? video is set up: even though M is 007's boss, she would never get away with shenanigans that make James Bond so endearing to the world.  So, no, we are not equal. 



 

“The Social Network”: A Case of a Failed CFO


Social_network_Andrew_Garfield_04 It's the Oscars week.  You cannot escape the promotional hype unless you cut yourself off from all media. 

The movie leading in the preliminary rounds (Golden Globes, various Guilds, etc.) is "The Social Network."   It's not surprising – the popularity of this movie is rooted in public's preoccupation with sudden success and overnight rise to riches.

Well, the reason for me to write about this film is that I cannot miss the opportunity to discuss a character, who in 2004 thought of himself as a CFO of Facebook. 

When Mark Zuckerberg appointed Eduardo Saverin to be his CFO, it was a logical step for the 20-year-old code-writing CEO.  Saverin was a close friend; appeared to be versed in business matters; more importantly, he had personal funds, having just made $300K through savvy oil investments.  Is this enough to make somebody an acting CFO?  Of course, not.  However, one could have learned how to be one.   It was not the case here.

If nothing else, the movie provides vivid illustrations to what a real CFO should NEVER-EVER DO.

1.  The first thing that Mr. Saverin did wrong was not taking his appointment seriously. He did not bother to define his role, his functions, his practical responsibilities.  If you are not creating the product itself, you should be doing other things that make you irreplaceable.

2.  When you accept CFO position, you become your CEO's partner.  That means you develop common vision, you define company's mission.  When it's finalized, you shove your disagreements aside and you do your best to facilitate the success on the chosen path.

3.  You NEVER separate from the company.  All experienced CFOs know that things can happen behind your back even if you seat in the next-door office.  If you are on the opposite coast and out of touch, consider yourself out.

4.  With startups, you should always try to utilize your company's growth potential to the fullest and then capitalize on it.  If Mr. Saverin wasn't so arrogant and argumentative, he most likely would realize that  online advertising brings real money only on a big scale.  Hence the right strategy was to look for more investors for the company growing with an astronomical speed.  Instead, he wasted his time setting up appointments with advertisers.

5.  If you want to stay with the company, you shoud NEVER do anything to damage it out of spite: closing accounts, calling the cops – that's just wrong.

6.  And you ALWAYS, not just read, but study every single legal document you sign.

Following the film's paradoxical leitmotif of an awkward kid creating the largest social network on this planet, the filmmakers suggest that Mark Zuckerberg pushed Mr. Saverin out of Facebook, because Eduardo got accepted into The Phoenix Club at Harvard.   

"You may say that I'm a dreamer," but I want to believe that Mr. Zuckerberg and people around him realized they have no use for someone who couldn't contribute into the exploding enterprise's development.  Just screaming all the time, "I'm the CFO," doesn't make you one.             

 

The Best Boss in Cinematic History


Ever since I started this blog, I have been searching my memory for a movie character who would exemplify the "ideal boss."  And I don't mean just some harmless person who stays out of your way.  Those are not good bosses – they don't bother you, but they don't improve your professional status either.  I mean a really-really good boss: someone who pays attention to his employees' progress, to their state of mind; someone who facilitates utilization of employees' potentials to the fullest; someone who goes out of his way for the sake of his subordinates' job satisfaction.

I know it is a mythical creature of Gandalf and Dumbledore proportions.  That's why I wasn't looking for real-life examples.  I have never met such a boss.  And even though I try very hard to be a decent manager myself, my professional existence is too erratic for following through with all good intentions.  Moviemakers, on the other hand, are in the business of creating larger-than-life characters that don't necessarily reflect reality, but provide for highly engaging and, in some rare cases, intellectually impactful experiences.  Look, Francis Ford Coppola and Mario Puzo gave us a myth of a person for whom honor, love for his wife and children, and fairness were the most important things in life – Vito Corleone.  Do people like that exist in real life?  Of course, not.

I love and know Cinema.  My tastes are very eclectic.  I don't go for the mainstream adventure crap of the Clash of the Titans type.  But, from Federico Fellini's Casanova to Mike Judge's Idiocracy, from Lars Von Trier's Dogville to Guy Ritchie's Snatch, if it's anywhere between good and brilliant, I saw it.  There are American and foreign directors whose filmography I can recite by heart.  I go to festivals and have an IFC membership.  Surely, I thought, I can come up with a character that fits my description of an ideal boss.

Alas, it was not easy and took me several months of periodic pondering.  But last week, it finally hit me.  Eurika!  I found him!  It's the San Franciso Police Department captain in So I Married an Axe Murderer wonderfully portrayed by the great Alan Arkin.  This guy not only notices that something is wrong with his employee, Charlie's friend, officer Tony Giardino (Anthony LaPaglia), but he actually listens to his complains.  Moreover, for the sake of raising his employee's morale, he goes out of his way and indulges Tony's fantasy.

Just watch (by the way, I am very grateful to whoever smoothly compiled this video, which actually consists of three separate clips from different parts of the movie).



 

Do bosses like that exist in real life?  No, but it's fun to watch and dream. 

   

Your Boss: Value and Madness of an Entrepreneur


Many of my correspondents (CFO's, Controllers, Financial Directors) tell me that the biggest source of their stress and anxiety is the Boss.  I am sure we will be addressing this topic many times in different stories.  President, CEO, Owner, or whatever title they have chosen for themselves, more frequently then not, these entrepreneurs are the main reasons for our frustration.

Some of them are courageous and brilliant who actually foster and lead, others are batty and lucky who succeed in spite of themselves, and the others are lazy and disinterested who ruin everything even with our best efforts in place.  Regardless, they have few things in common. 

First of all, we can never forget that they are the ones creating jobs.  That's a tremendous achievement.  They've got to be madly brave to go out in the world and implement their ideas, sometimes against all odds.  If they succeed, they build companies that not only create products and services, but also employ people and pay them salaries.  They take insane risks and end up with entities that can afford to hire CFOs, Controllers, Financial Directors, i.e. us.  And even if the Bosses are not the founders, but heirs and the business just fell into their lap, until they destroy it, they are the employers and our salaries are coming out of their pockets.

Of course, as financial execs we kill ourselves in order to either facilitate their success and prosperity or stop them from  killing the business.  And even though we are concerned with our own material well-being just like anybody else, at the end of the day all of our efforts in a private company end up to be about guarding the owners' private purses.  That kind of a responsibility to a person in the office few steps down from your own brings the level of pressure to a completely different level.  It is not the same when your "owners" are some unknown masses of mutual fund investors.

But the most prominent common denominator of all small and mid-size CEOs is that they are all afflicted by the same disease – something I call an entrepreneurial bug. The business development machines in their heads run forward ahead of everything else.  They want everything to be done yesterday, and those who cannot make it happen or voice their concerns are considered to be obstacles on their way to success. 

Because it is up to us, CFOs and Controllers,  to make sure that the back office, the financing, the structures, the control procedures, etc. are on the par with new developments, we frequently find ourselves at odds with our Bosses.  We are called negative, uncooperative, difficult, etc. etc.  Nevertheless, we must be strong and do our jobs right, because if we fail to cover their fast running asses, everyone will get hurt, including the Bosses.