Tag: CEO

Insecure Business Owner/CEO


130px-Pointy-Haired_BossPeople write about insecure bosses all the time. There are blog posts, articles, book chapters, cartoons, movies, and TV shows devoted to the subject of dealing with a superior who feels threatened by his subordinates.  Hey, bosses are people and a vast majority of humanity is plagued by insecurities of various forms and degrees. The authors usually predict two possible outcomes of having such a boss: you will either find a way to overcome the problem and turn this person into your ally, or you get fired.  Curiously, in these writings "the boss" in question is usually another hired employee perched on a higher step of the hierarchy ladder.  (It has always surprised me, why these advisers never consider a possibility of you finding the way of getting the insecure boss fired.)

However, when your insecure boss owns the company that employs you, it's a completely different situation altogether.  Here he (or she, or they) was, the big boss with a business that he's built, thinking that he is the shit, the sharpest tool not just in some lousy shed, but in a suburban Home Depot… Until you came along, with your diverse expertise, broad fundamental knowledge, etc.

Now, you start discovering all kind of stupid stuff.  If you are indeed an experienced person, you are not running around like an idiotic show-off screaming that everything is wrong.  No, you tread lightly.  At the same time you must do your job and, therefore, correct the stupid stuff.  So, you say careful things like, "Excuse me, I mean no disrespect, but this and that is not done properly and will result in long-term losses; and, by the way, your accounting doesn't comply with prescribed rules."  You have no choice but to reveal painful observations such as, "You know, that operating system you bought just before your hired me (couldn't you wait?) on recommendation of someone you know, sucks!  You were misled – it's not an ERP, it's a retarded cousin of a real ERP twice removed."

Moreover, from time to time, things come out of your boss's mouth that are not just silly, they are embarrassingly incorrect.  Of course, you can ignore it, and yet you cannot, because if you don't clarify his confusions and educate him, he may say something stupid in front of your bankers, or investors, or auditors.  So, you have no choice but to find an appropriate way to straighten him out, raise his sophistication.

And even though you openly express due respect for his entrepreneurial abilities and acute commercial intuition, he cannot avoid feeling inadequate, insecure.  It's unpleasant and he doesn't like it at all.  Yet, unless you become rude and inappropriate, your job is secure.  The idea of firing you wouldn't even come to his logical conscious mind.  First of all, he knows that the company (i.e. his wallet) needs you and your improvements.  Secondly, you took over quite few tasks, freeing him for business development.   Finally, he doesn't have time or desire to go through the search process again.

Still, from time to time the subconsciousness feels pangs of wounded ego.  When that happens, he'll do anything to make himself feel better.  He will find one or another way to get back at you.  If you have an accent (Irish, Italian, Slavic, French), he will interrupt you in the middle of a meeting and ask the outsiders if they understand at least 30% of what you were saying, even though your English is fluent.  Your writing skills are likely to be far more superior than his, but he will make you run drafts of emails to important people by him, claiming their "political importance."  He may get into habit of reminding you that, considering your compensation, he expects a lot from you, even though you have exceeded all his expectations already.  And so on, and so forth…  

This behavior is childish.  The mere knowledge that it's rooted in his insecurity should help you to brush it off.  Don't let yourself to be hurt by it.  Don't think, "This is not fair, I am helping his business."  Don't take it as an insult.   Accept it as a testimony to your superiority.  

CFO Folklore: The Home Front


Images-1 I touch on the gender inequality among financial execs once in a while – an obligatory topic for a female CFO/author/blogger.  I mean, everyone writes about it.  Entire institutions and organizations compile sociological studies dealing with these issues.  None of it seems to be creating any changing momentum, but hey, at least someone is willing to pay the researchers their salaries. 

The interesting thing, though, that most of the time these topics (including my earlier posts) deal with the social, rather than practical, aspects of the phenomenon.  People talk about advancement rates, compensation levels, female-to-male executives proportions, etc.  In a very scientific way, we say: all things being equal (education, achievements, intelligence, etc.), women still don't get a fair shake.   And nobody talks about the fact that, on a practical level, things are never equal between men and women, who strive for, or already achieved, top job positions.

First of all, women by nature are more conscientious and responsible than men.  That is why we have higher percentage of female straight "A" students both in high schools and colleges (yet, there are more male valedictorians!).  Secondly, women know only too well that they are at disadvantage due to the simple fact that they are not men.  That makes them work ten times harder than any man in their position would.  So, in truth they get rewarded at lower rates not for the equally good work, but for the job done much better.

But the biggest practical inequality occurs on the executive's home front.  I remember having a friendly airplane conversation with my CEO, on our way to a meeting in Germany.  At one point he said that I was the hardest working person he knew besides him – he honestly believed that he worked as hard as I did.  Of course, he was talking about the job itself.  Well, I thought that even at that I worked much harder (I did not take Friday's off during summers), but I chose to turn to more obvious facts of life.

I asked, " Who prepares your suit, shirt and tie for tomorrow every evening?"  "My wife," he said.  "We frequently work until 9 or 10 pm, is the dinner ready, when you come home?" "Yes."  "Who writes checks?  Who deals with repairmen?  Who talks to teachers?  Who buys groceries? Who takes kids to the doctors'?"  "The wife" was the answer to all the questions.  "Now, who do you think does all that in my home?"  

He knew the answer, of course.  So, every day I was working my executive job, let's say, just as hard as he did, plus his wife's job.  And that's true for most of female CFOs, whether married or single, with or without children. 

Look, how many unmarried male CFOs or Controllers you know?  I don't know any.  Even if their wives leave them, they get remarried very quickly – someone needs to take care of the home front.

On the other hand, a woman expected either to give up her personal life for the career, or hide it away, as if she does not have any.  It is especially true for those female executives who work in small and midsize companies – the salaries are not large enough to afford a Mr. Mom of a husband.  So, we are talking inequality cubed: the majority of women work harder, plus cover the home front (or give up life outside of the job), and still get paid and promoted on a much smaller scale. 

Here is the funny part.  At the end my boss asked, "How come you still read more than I do and go to the theater all the time?"  "Because I don't sleep," I answered.

Your Boss: Value and Madness of an Entrepreneur


Many of my correspondents (CFO's, Controllers, Financial Directors) tell me that the biggest source of their stress and anxiety is the Boss.  I am sure we will be addressing this topic many times in different stories.  President, CEO, Owner, or whatever title they have chosen for themselves, more frequently then not, these entrepreneurs are the main reasons for our frustration.

Some of them are courageous and brilliant who actually foster and lead, others are batty and lucky who succeed in spite of themselves, and the others are lazy and disinterested who ruin everything even with our best efforts in place.  Regardless, they have few things in common. 

First of all, we can never forget that they are the ones creating jobs.  That's a tremendous achievement.  They've got to be madly brave to go out in the world and implement their ideas, sometimes against all odds.  If they succeed, they build companies that not only create products and services, but also employ people and pay them salaries.  They take insane risks and end up with entities that can afford to hire CFOs, Controllers, Financial Directors, i.e. us.  And even if the Bosses are not the founders, but heirs and the business just fell into their lap, until they destroy it, they are the employers and our salaries are coming out of their pockets.

Of course, as financial execs we kill ourselves in order to either facilitate their success and prosperity or stop them from  killing the business.  And even though we are concerned with our own material well-being just like anybody else, at the end of the day all of our efforts in a private company end up to be about guarding the owners' private purses.  That kind of a responsibility to a person in the office few steps down from your own brings the level of pressure to a completely different level.  It is not the same when your "owners" are some unknown masses of mutual fund investors.

But the most prominent common denominator of all small and mid-size CEOs is that they are all afflicted by the same disease – something I call an entrepreneurial bug. The business development machines in their heads run forward ahead of everything else.  They want everything to be done yesterday, and those who cannot make it happen or voice their concerns are considered to be obstacles on their way to success. 

Because it is up to us, CFOs and Controllers,  to make sure that the back office, the financing, the structures, the control procedures, etc. are on the par with new developments, we frequently find ourselves at odds with our Bosses.  We are called negative, uncooperative, difficult, etc. etc.  Nevertheless, we must be strong and do our jobs right, because if we fail to cover their fast running asses, everyone will get hurt, including the Bosses.

CFO Folklore: Frustrating and Demeaning Mistrust


The “Hands-Off Micromanagement” style  so prominent in many business owners— and defined in my September 21, 2010 post —has a lot of implications in daily lives of CFO’s and Controllers.  One of the most frustrating facets has to do with petty mistrust. 

I’ve got volumes of stories illustrating this particular trait of a CFO vs Owner relationship.  Here is a compiled rendition of a rather frequently recurring Tale of Mistrust from the CFO Folklore.

AlphaOmega Inc. is a treasury-intense company and its CFO devotes big chunk of his time managing it.  He personally decides on daily basis whether the company needs to borrow to cover operational deficit or invest the excess of available funds.  He is singly responsible for signing financial instruments, including multimillion-dollar letters of credits and commercial loans paid directly to suppliers.  He electronically hedges foreign currencies, sometimes  as much as $1 million per transaction.  His discounting customers’ trade documents  on London Forfeiting Market frequently reaches $20 million per tranche.

Carrying all these monetary responsibilities makes him especially meticulous about the separation of duties and internal controls.  None of the transactions he personally conducts are recorded by him.  He deliberately never cuts any checks.  He has a designated treasury operator setting up all the wire transfers.  The companies books and records are regularly audited by lenders.  And his quarterly and annual accounting audits are always clean and produce unqualified opinions.

And yet…  he has no authority to sign a $1 check or execute a $10 wire transfer release.  Only the Boss can do that. 

And this Boss is not available for you whenever you need him: the business frequently takes him abroad; May through September he is in his summer house; he has to spend holidays with his kids; and he has a girlfriend (you know, afternoon delight and all that). 

Moreover, he hates signing checks and keeps ignoring that thick folder the AP manager put into his in-box two days ago.  And every time the CFO sends a “pleeeease-release-wires” email, the Boss acts like he is asked to grant a personal favor.  And it is the CFO who has to deal with the frustration of vendors and suppliers waiting for their payments. 

The situation drives him crazy and causes perpetual frustration and anxiety.  Swallowing his pride and ignoring the insulting pettiness of such mistrust, the CFO addressed the issue many times, sticking strictly to the damage the situation causes the business.  He explained on numerous occasions that the way his internal controls are set up, it would require his entire stuff to be part of a scheme to steal even a dollar from the company.  He also explained that their treasury systems allow to set up limits of execution authority and that the Boss shouldn’t be bothered with $2,000 wire transfers.  

All falls on deaf ears.   So, the poor CFO still chases his boss somewhere in Hong Kong, begging him to release today’s wires before the banks’ cutoff time of 5 pm EST, which is 6 AM tomorrow over there.


Business Owners’ Favorite Style of Management


Some people are born with incredible natural aptitude for managing people.  Many years ago I observed a girl on a playground.  She was about 5 years old playing with a group of children the same age.  At one point some play rules, or another important issue, needed to be established, and I was amazed not only by the assertion of authority, but also by the uncanny logic exhibited by this extraordinary little person.  She started with a commanding, "Children, listen to me!" and continued laying out a proposal that nobody has any inclination to dispute.  I remember thinking to myself, "That's a naturally born leader!"

Unfortunately, people like that constitute a small percentage of general population and, strangely enough, they are even rarer among business owners.  Just because someone had a great idea and entrepreneurial drive to establish their own business doesn't mean that they also have sufficient managerial aptitude.  Only few of them had formal business management education and most of them never worked for anybody else long enough to gain on-the-job expertise.  

This pretty much leaves their leadership skills at intuitive level at best.  And if the sixth sense fails them… well, all kind of sad things occur: they cannot see the difference between a pompous phony with an impressive voice spewing well formulated lies and genuinely knowledgeable, but quiet workaholic; they have very little or no understanding of delegation of duties; frequently they cannot even figure out their own roles in the company.  

The most common executive management conundrum such Presidents/CEO's (especially first generation of business ownership) encounter after the enterprise reaches the "established" stage of development can be described as follows.  Their entrepreneurial talents draw their minds to further commercial improvements, to generation of new ideas that will help to expand and strengthen the business.  At the same time, the wonderful feeling of accomplishment plays dirty tricks on them: subconsciously they want to rest on their laurels – they feel that they deserve to work less, to take summers off, etc. etc.  Moreover, since the business is their child that they have born and reared applying their own talents and titanic efforts, they have incredible aversion to the idea of letting other people to completely take over vital tasks of the company's ongoing functionality and maintenance.   

(Side note: I am really tempted to state here that the majority of them are control freaks.  However, I don't have scientific evidence for that, just my own and my colleagues experience. More importantly, it does not make a difference, both obsessive and perfectly balanced CEO's display the same symptoms.) 

You have to agree that this position is absolutely psychotic.  What do they do?  They resort to their favorite style of management – what I personally coined several years ago as "Hands-Off Micromanagement."  

Let me show with this example how this control style may manifest itself. On one hand, the CEO can completely forget that you are working on establishing a $10 million credit line with a new bank, or that you have just upgraded your accounting system to a new version that basically made the entire budgeting function automatic.  But on the other hand, he keeps asking without a fail every month why the Federal Express bill is $2,000 – when he was starting the business it was never more than $100.

I am sure a lot of my fellow CFO's and Controllers have recognized the disease as they have to deal with it and the frustration it causes on daily basis.